First topic message reminder :

Malaysia Airlines said it lost contact with a plane carrying 239 people on its way from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing.
The plane disappeared on March 8, the problem is, with so little directional information to start with (six and a partial seventh ping, transmitted at hourly intervals), are we SURE we are even searching the right ocean? Why have we heard NOTHING from Rolls Royce re the real time engine management monitoring system? If those following the serious clues left available there is only one question to ask. Why does no one mention the Indian Oceans most advanced and secure air base, the stationary Aircraft Carrier located south of the southern tip of India called Diego Garcia? Not a peep. Not even an indication of a US managed military installation that monitors everything in this war region. In fact the best old metaphor regarding the lack of reference to this location is “The Silence Is Deafening.” Only one nation on earth has the technology to remotely block a planes radar and communications if they felt their base was under threat from a terrorist attack. I believe in the coming days or weeks it will be the USA who find evidence that the plane crashed ??? but in fact I believe it was probably shot down.

And if we are ever told anything it will only be what they want to tell us which will be far from the truth I'm sure.

Another way of putting it is that real facts have been withheld or suppressed and we have been fed a load of bogus information. What are often being dismissed as conspiracy theory are efforts by many to reconcile the lies we are told with new information which keeps coming to light. Given the total lack of transparency and lack of credibility in many claims for example the Thai radar sighting when radar in Thailand could not see an aircraft at IGARI below 55,000ft, then it is easy to see why bizarre theories keep emerging. Often no less bizarre by the way than the official pilot suicide theory.

MH 370, you need to apply a bit of reverse logic. Consider you are one of the Malaysian officials charged with creating a narrative that the world press will swallow. In that light, rather than being bumbling fools, they have done very well. Next in line, the USA took almost no part in the searching. but made a discreet indication of where to look. Excellent diversionary tactics. I am not convinced of the “southern route” at all however I am concerned about the route described by the pings if the “northern route” were taken. It is almost a perfect straight line, It's too coincidental? Kazakhstan reported in after a few days that they had done a search but the plane was not there? how could they be so certain so quickly? More sinister in thought is the possibilities when you think of the prompt dismissal of the sightings of a low flying MH plane by Maldivians. There is a cover up going on. Just what the truth is requires Wikileaks in their finest hour to find out for us.

Report: MH370 search could be completed by May.

MH370 The search for missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 covering 60,000 square kilometres of southern Indian Ocean seabed could be completed by May, it was reported today.

Officials of the Joint Agency Coordination Centre (JACC), which is overseeing the search, told the Perth Sunday Times newspaper the three ships involved in the massive underwater hunt had covered two-thirds of the priority zone of the search area.

It had originally been thought the search could take 12 months. The newspaper also reported JACC could not clarify what would happen if the plane wasn’t found in the search area.

It has been just over nine months since Malaysian flight MH370 disappeared en route from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing with 239 passengers and crew on board.

The search zone 1,200 kilometres south-west of Perth has been deemed the most likely area where the plane went down based on satellite connections to the aircraft that show it changed course for unknown reasons, first to the west and then south.

The Australian Transport and Safety Bureau has released a computer animated video and sonar images of the Indian Ocean’s 6-kilometre-deep seabed taken by the search ship GO Phoenix.

It shows endless kilometres of sandy hills and gullies, but still no trace of the missing plane.

Here's an interesting report

MH370 was 'shot down by US military', claims former French airline boss

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Gimp wrote:

Here's an interesting report

MH370 was 'shot down by US military', claims former French airline boss

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

and to add to your post Gimp, here is more interesting information [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] ... ego-garcia
The only question I would ask if the facts are true, why hasn't any debris been found

willowsend wrote:

Gimp wrote:

Here's an interesting report

MH370 was 'shot down by US military', claims former French airline boss

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

and to add to your post Gimp, here is more interesting information [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] ... ego-garcia
The only question I would ask if the facts are true, why hasn't any debris been found. The take-off weight off an airplane of that size is 450 tons, that is a lot of debris

Maybe they were deliberately searching in the wrong place which we know if it was shot down over Garcia? which would have given them plenty of time to clear up and lets thing about that? being a top secret military base then there would have been and air space that was off limits and the same applies to the ocean so no one would have witnessed anything while the evidence was being removed.

Very very possible Daisy. Lets look at this the distance to Diego Garcia from where the plane vanished = 2700 miles. Distance to Alleged crash site west of Australia from where the plane vanished = 3900 miles. So explain exactly how the plane doesn't have enough fuel to make it to Diego Garcia but somehow has enough to make it 1200 miles further?

A US CIA drone shot the plane down. There was a man "
linked to terror"
on board using a fake passport so the US decided to 'drone' him. There was some 'collateral damage', but the US got the 'bad guy' so it is all ok. They can't talk about it because of reasons of "
national security"
and remember that at the time the US didn't have anything to say at all which is a first for them.

A 777 is a big plane. No oil slick even though with empty tanks there is still enough to form a sizeable slick. The aircraft is packed with 'floatables';
That plane is either safely on the ground or landed so gently on the sea it did not break up and sank intact. If it had been blown out of the sky there would be tons of debris floating about for years. The oil slick would be miles long. Considering the amount of resources thrown at the search something would have been found by now. It's on the ground. The question is did it land safely or crash land. Wonder how much North Korea knows about it. They are certainly secretive enough to keep this quiet.

Andy wrote:

Very very possible Daisy. Lets look at this the distance to Diego Garcia from where the plane vanished = 2700 miles. Distance to Alleged crash site west of Australia from where the plane vanished = 3900 miles. So explain exactly how the plane doesn't have enough fuel to make it to Diego Garcia but somehow has enough to make it 1200 miles further?

A couple more facts : Technical Characteristics. ... Maximum Fuel Capacity**, 63,705 U.S. gal (241,140 L) ... Maximum Range, 7,670 nautical miles (14,205 km)
I have heard so many reports from different people who work in the aviation industry, and the general census opinion is that that plane is in a hanger on Diego Garcia

willowsend wrote:

Andy wrote:

Very very possible Daisy. Lets look at this the distance to Diego Garcia from where the plane vanished = 2700 miles. Distance to Alleged crash site west of Australia from where the plane vanished = 3900 miles. So explain exactly how the plane doesn't have enough fuel to make it to Diego Garcia but somehow has enough to make it 1200 miles further?

A couple more facts : Technical Characteristics. ... Maximum Fuel Capacity**, 63,705 U.S. gal (241,140 L) ... Maximum Range, 7,670 nautical miles (14,205 km)
I have heard so many reports from different people who work in the aviation industry, and the general census opinion is that that plane is in a hanger on Diego Garcia

I don't think we will ever know the truth but I agree with the thought that the us is behind it.

krypton wrote:

I don't think we will ever know the truth but I agree with the thought that the us is behind it.

but many people keep coming up with idea's and possible answers
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] ... 41886.html
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] ... nd-2047182
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] ... ef-2046352