MPs' expenses: David Chaytor jailed over false claims

Ex-Labour MP David Chaytor has been jailed for 18 months for fraudulently claiming more than £20,000 in expenses.

Chaytor, 61, the former MP for Bury North, last month admitted three charges of false accounting.

He submitted bogus invoices for IT consultancy work and claimed rent he never paid on homes owned by his family, the court was told.

His lawyer James Sturman QC said he was a "
broken man"
who had paid a "
devastating price"
for the claims.

The former MP is now facing a large legal bill for both his defence and the costs of bringing the prosecution against him.

Chaytor made the false expenses claims in order to "
siphon off"
public money to which he was not entitled, the court heard.

Sentencing him Mr Justice Saunders said the 2009 MPs' expenses scandal had "
shaken public confidence in the legislature and angered the public"
.

He said: "
These false claims were made in breach of the high degree of trust placed in MPs to only make legitimate claims.

"
These offences have wider and more important consequences than is to be found in other breach of trust cases. That is the effect they have had and will have in the confidence the public has in politicians."


'Significant penalties'

The judge said MPs' behaviour must be "
entirely honest if public confidence in the parliamentary system and rule of law is to be maintained"
.
He added that when fraudulent claims were discovered "
significant penalties should follow so people realise how important it is for people to be honest in dealing with public funds"
.

Chaytor had been due to be the first MP to stand trial over expenses but changed his plea to guilty days before it started.

Two other former MPs, one current MP and two members of the House of Lords are due to face separate trials over their expenses claims. All have pleaded not guilty.

Chaytor, of Lumbutts, Todmorden, West Yorkshire, was paid £18,350 from the false claims.

A further £1,950 fraudulently claimed for IT support services was not paid out, because he had already exceeded his allowance for that type of expense.

The court heard that Chaytor was paid £12,925 for rent on a flat near Westminster between 2005 and 2006 which he owned, using a fake tenancy agreement with a "
Sarah Elizabeth Rastrick"
- his daughter's first and middle names.

He claimed £1,175 over 12 months but the court heard he did not pay out any money himself.
He also claimed £5,425 for renting a cottage in Summerseat, near Bury in Lancashire between September 2007 and January 2008. A police investigation discovered it was actually owned by his mother, Olive Trickett, who had moved into a nursing home in May 2007 because she had dementia.

The claim for IT support services, made in May 2006, came as "
something of a surprise"
to the man named in the invoice - Paul France - the court heard, because he had not billed the former MP for any work. Mr France was a Labour member who did voluntary work at Chaytor's office.

'Genuine remorse'

Prosecutor Peter Wright QC said: "
The claims were fictitious. He had never incurred the consultancy fees, nor had he ever paid any sum in respect of any such alleged service.

"
So far as the alleged rental of the properties in London and Summer seat were concerned, they were based entirely on bogus documents and, we submit, were designed by him to siphon money off from the public purse to which he was not entitled."


But Chaytor's defence lawyer James Sturman QC, said the former MP pleaded guilty out of "
deep and genuine remorse"
and had already paid a "
quite devastating price"
for his errors.

"
We submit that the sums he received, if he had gone about it transparently, honestly and frankly, he would have been entitled to every penny, if not more than he claimed,"
said Mr Sturman, adding Chaytor had displayed "
inexplicable stupidity"
by submitting the false documents.

He had argued that any prison sentence should be suspended and a community punishment imposed.

Chaytor stood down as an MP at the general election having been barred by Labour from standing for them again after stories about his claims emerged during the 2009 expenses scandal.

A Labour Party spokesman said: "
David Chaytor had already been suspended from the Labour Party and following his custodial sentence he has now been excluded from the party."


BBC home affairs correspondent Danny Shaw said Chaytor could be free by the end of May as prisoners given sentences of less than four years can be considered for early release - subject to electronic tagging and a curfew - if they are not convicted of violent or sexual offences.

Labour MP John Mann warned party leaders to give more support to the independent expenses regulator - set up following the 2009 expenses scandal - which has been under fire from some MPs. In December PM David Cameron said the new system was "
anti family"
and must change. He told a meeting of the backbench Tory 1922 committee he wanted a better system in place by April.

Mr Mann said: "
The independent system established through legislation requires the full and unequivocal support of Parliament and of the three party leaders."

Admin wrote:

MPs' expenses: David Chaytor jailed over false claim

Post by Admin » 07 Jan 2011 21:52
MPs' expenses: David Chaytor jailed over false claims

Ex-Labour MP David Chaytor has been jailed for 18 months for fraudulently claiming more than £20,000 in expenses.

Chaytor, 61, the former MP for Bury North, last month admitted three charges of false accounting.

He submitted bogus invoices for IT consultancy work and claimed rent he never paid on homes owned by his family, the court was told.

His lawyer James Sturman QC said he was a "
broken man"
who had paid a "
devastating price"
for the claims.

The former MP is now facing a large legal bill for both his defence and the costs of bringing the prosecution against him.

Chaytor made the false expenses claims in order to "
siphon off"
public money to which he was not entitled, the court heard.

Sentencing him Mr Justice Saunders said the 2009 MPs' expenses scandal had "
shaken public confidence in the legislature and angered the public"
.

He said: "
These false claims were made in breach of the high degree of trust placed in MPs to only make legitimate claims.

"
These offences have wider and more important consequences than is to be found in other breach of trust cases. That is the effect they have had and will have in the confidence the public has in politicians."


'Significant penalties'

The judge said MPs' behaviour must be "
entirely honest if public confidence in the parliamentary system and rule of law is to be maintained"
.
He added that when fraudulent claims were discovered "
significant penalties should follow so people realise how important it is for people to be honest in dealing with public funds"
.

Chaytor had been due to be the first MP to stand trial over expenses but changed his plea to guilty days before it started.

Two other former MPs, one current MP and two members of the House of Lords are due to face separate trials over their expenses claims. All have pleaded not guilty.

Chaytor, of Lumbutts, Todmorden, West Yorkshire, was paid £18,350 from the false claims.

A further £1,950 fraudulently claimed for IT support services was not paid out, because he had already exceeded his allowance for that type of expense.

The court heard that Chaytor was paid £12,925 for rent on a flat near Westminster between 2005 and 2006 which he owned, using a fake tenancy agreement with a "
Sarah Elizabeth Rastrick"
- his daughter's first and middle names.

He claimed £1,175 over 12 months but the court heard he did not pay out any money himself.
He also claimed £5,425 for renting a cottage in Summerseat, near Bury in Lancashire between September 2007 and January 2008. A police investigation discovered it was actually owned by his mother, Olive Trickett, who had moved into a nursing home in May 2007 because she had dementia.

The claim for IT support services, made in May 2006, came as "
something of a surprise"
to the man named in the invoice - Paul France - the court heard, because he had not billed the former MP for any work. Mr France was a Labour member who did voluntary work at Chaytor's office.

'Genuine remorse'

Prosecutor Peter Wright QC said: "
The claims were fictitious. He had never incurred the consultancy fees, nor had he ever paid any sum in respect of any such alleged service.

"
So far as the alleged rental of the properties in London and Summer seat were concerned, they were based entirely on bogus documents and, we submit, were designed by him to siphon money off from the public purse to which he was not entitled."


But Chaytor's defence lawyer James Sturman QC, said the former MP pleaded guilty out of "
deep and genuine remorse"
and had already paid a "
quite devastating price"
for his errors.

"
We submit that the sums he received, if he had gone about it transparently, honestly and frankly, he would have been entitled to every penny, if not more than he claimed,"
said Mr Sturman, adding Chaytor had displayed "
inexplicable stupidity"
by submitting the false documents.

He had argued that any prison sentence should be suspended and a community punishment imposed.

Chaytor stood down as an MP at the general election having been barred by Labour from standing for them again after stories about his claims emerged during the 2009 expenses scandal.

A Labour Party spokesman said: "
David Chaytor had already been suspended from the Labour Party and following his custodial sentence he has now been excluded from the party."


BBC home affairs correspondent Danny Shaw said Chaytor could be free by the end of May as prisoners given sentences of less than four years can be considered for early release - subject to electronic tagging and a curfew - if they are not convicted of violent or sexual offences.

Labour MP John Mann warned party leaders to give more support to the independent expenses regulator - set up following the 2009 expenses scandal - which has been under fire from some MPs. In December PM David Cameron said the new system was "
anti family"
and must change. He told a meeting of the backbench Tory 1922 committee he wanted a better system in place by April.

Mr Mann said: "
The independent system established through legislation requires the full and unequivocal support of Parliament and of the three party leaders."


Top

He'd have been OK if he moved to Bulgaria - probably promoted to a top Govt position by Boyko for initiative beyond the call of duty

I don't accept the mitigation plea. He was not in constrained circumstances like many people on benefits. Sadly we have discovered that we cannot put our MPs on trust, we would like to but it seems that they are more likely to be "
at it"
than anyone who ever over claimed benefits. They are complaining about their IPSA deal but it seems that they care little for the electorate who, in my personal opinion, now look to be faced with some kind of fraud and deception or deliberate obscurity in every contract or agreement that involves regular payments of money. When they have finished chasing their own interests they need to give some attention to, what in my view, is a world of obstruction, obscurity and deception and establish some kind of standard contracts that do not contain weasel words. Now that they have experienced it perhaps they will realise that there is also another scandal with an elephant so big that you cannot even get into the room.

BGTRAVELLER wrote:

I don't accept the mitigation plea. He was not in constrained circumstances like many people on benefits. Sadly we have discovered that we cannot put our MPs on trust, we would like to but it seems that they are more likely to be "
at it"
than anyone who ever over claimed benefits. They are complaining about their IPSA deal but it seems that they care little for the electorate who, in my personal opinion, now look to be faced with some kind of fraud and deception or deliberate obscurity in every contract or agreement that involves regular payments of money. When they have finished chasing their own interests they need to give some attention to, what in my view, is a world of obstruction, obscurity and deception and establish some kind of standard contracts that do not contain weasel words. Now that they have experienced it perhaps they will realise that there is also another scandal with an elephant so big that you cannot even get into the room.

He got what he deserved. its a pity that the Bulgarian judges don't follow in the same footsteps

He got what he deserved. He is only a Broken Man now as he got caught. I also hope he was made to pay everything back that he "
stole"
!! His sentence was obviously reduced as he pleaded guilty so now it may make the others think about pleading guilty and saving the courts time and money. And if they don't and are found guilty then hopefully they will get tough sentences.

meandmine wrote:

He got what he deserved. He is only a Broken Man now as he got caught. I also hope he was made to pay everything back that he "
stole"
!! His sentence was obviously reduced as he pleaded guilty so now it may make the others think about pleading guilty and saving the courts time and money. And if they don't and are found guilty then hopefully they will get tough sentences.

Yes, he got what he deserved, it is hoped that this penalty will act as an example to all the others that think the electorate will carry on accepting their behaviour. Politicians think they are on another planet compared to other mortals.

In simple terms he broke the law,as like us common people he has to be punished,well done judge

Pity is wasn't longer so he could rot in there